There is no doubt that
disruptive pupils might have a negative impact on other students, and that
their troublesome behaviour may deter ordinary students from studying; however,
I still believe that gathering pupils with misbehaviour together to be taught
separately would not improve the situation.
First of all, pupils are
disruptive for all sorts of reasons. They might suffer from insecurity due to
family problems; boredom, which can be caused by an uninspired curriculum;
learning difficulties; or poor self-confidence that often leads to
aggressiveness and conspicuous behaviour. When these factors are considered, it
is certainly not a good idea to put all children with more or less the same
problems in one classroom, simply because they would lack the opportunity to be
positively influenced by well-behaved pupils in order to develop optimal
behaviour. In fact, their behaviour might worsen, if they are solely surrounded
by disruptive children.
While some people argue
that separation would be beneficial not only to students but also to teachers
who want to work without interruption, disruptive pupils could believe that
they are being isolated because something is seriously wrong with them. As a
result, they could feel excluded, which eventually lowers their self-esteem and
might worsen their behaviour.
Last, but not least, the
implementation of separate groups for noisy students demands additional expenses
for school authorities, since extra teachers and rooms will have to be provided.
Moreover, teachers will have to be prepared with professional training to deal
with this kind of behaviour, which means increased costs.
To sum up, the idea of
separate classes is not an effective solution to the problem of disruptive
behaviour at school. In my opinion, it would be advantageous if teachers were
equipped with strategies on how to tackle the problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment