Culture Days 2013

A number of interesting culture topics, a “hot” atmosphere, a teacher sitting in front of a fan in order to be able to get through every presentation, and nervous students walking around hoping not to mess up their presentations while the rest was indecisive about which presentation to attend…of course, I am writing about the ‘Culture Days 2013’.

Although I had planned to go to exactly 10 presentations, I ended up seeing 19.

Irish topics: Abortion Law in Ireland- A pro-choice view; Ireland’s contribution to the world of videogames; The Irish Film Industry; The Life of Irish Traveller Women; Bloody Sunday; Gaelic and its use in Northern Ireland; Patrick Nee; Operation Demetrius; Oscar Wilde and William Yeats; The Integration of Islam in Ireland; Witchcraft in Ireland; Homophobic Bullying in Irish schools; Kilmainham Gaol; The hidden meanings of the children of Lir; Gerry Conlon; Cultural influences on Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels

American topics: Walt Disney; Oprah Winfrey; Harlem, New York

Overall, the topics were really interesting as well as greatly presented; however, since we have to pick five topics to be tested on in the KGP, I have chosen these five:

1. Gerry Conlon reflects on the case of the Guildford Four: I have never heard of this case before, but the topic and how they were tortured as well as the presentation really grabbed my attention.
2. The Life of Irish Traveller Women: I find their life, their history and traditions highly interesting.
3. Abortion Law in Ireland –A Pro-Choice View: How the pro-choice movement fight for women’s right to choose that has created heated debate in the Republic in Ireland-tremendously interesting!
4. Ireland- the birthplace of Witchcraft: I really liked the presentation and the topic and since I have never dealt with that topic before, I would really like to learn some more about it.
5. Homophobic Bullying in Irish schools: Serious and touching topic. Bullying has become a serious issue in the past 30, 40 years, especially among homosexual people, and should really be addressed. 

Disruptive Behaviour

I've recently read an article about disruptive pupils and that they should be put in separate classrooms as not to disturb the other students. Is this really the right solution to the problem? 

There is no doubt that disruptive pupils might have a negative impact on other students, and that their troublesome behaviour may deter ordinary students from studying; however, I still believe that gathering pupils with misbehaviour together to be taught separately would not improve the situation.

First of all, pupils are disruptive for all sorts of reasons. They might suffer from insecurity due to family problems; boredom, which can be caused by an uninspired curriculum; learning difficulties; or poor self-confidence that often leads to aggressiveness and conspicuous behaviour. When these factors are considered, it is certainly not a good idea to put all children with more or less the same problems in one classroom, simply because they would lack the opportunity to be positively influenced by well-behaved pupils in order to develop optimal behaviour. In fact, their behaviour might worsen, if they are solely surrounded by disruptive children.

While some people argue that separation would be beneficial not only to students but also to teachers who want to work without interruption, disruptive pupils could believe that they are being isolated because something is seriously wrong with them. As a result, they could feel excluded, which eventually lowers their self-esteem and might worsen their behaviour.

Last, but not least, the implementation of separate groups for noisy students demands additional expenses for school authorities, since extra teachers and rooms will have to be provided. Moreover, teachers will have to be prepared with professional training to deal with this kind of behaviour, which means increased costs.

To sum up, the idea of separate classes is not an effective solution to the problem of disruptive behaviour at school. In my opinion, it would be advantageous if teachers were equipped with strategies on how to tackle the problem.

Atypical Romantic Comedies

Almost universally, the film genre of comedy is both understood and well liked. Although there are numerous types of comedy and various viewer preferences, a light-hearted plot line, few focal characters, and happily ever after ending for the most part rarely disappoint. In recent years the romantic comedy, a sub-genre, has dramatically increased its appearance on the screen. Although the term is rather general and no particular definition of it is adhered to, a romantic element, comedic spin, and happy ending are undeniably essential to satisfy the general expectation of what a romantic comedy “should be.” Yet arguably the quality of these films has declined and their plot lines painfully overused. Boy meets girl, boy gets girl then loses her, one or both of their lives is changed forevermore, and eventually boy gets girl once again; add a few comedic scenes and voilà!—yet another romantic comedy is born.

Few directors have diverged from this standard formula, and fewer romantic comedies can be said to have unpredictable endings simply after viewing the first twenty minutes. Yet such deviant films do exist although they are few and far in between. In recent years, Chris and Paul Weitz have been rather adventurous with the genre, especially seen in their film About a Boy (Universal Pictures, 2002); and some decades ago, director George Cukor adapted George Bernard Shaw’s play entitled “Pygmalion” to the screen in another atypical romantic comedy and classic film, My Fair Lady (Warner Brothers, 1964). Both films have humor and some interplay of a love story—essential markers of a romantic comedy—but unconventionally the romance is not the center of either film.

About a Boy did not receive nearly as much critical acclaim as the eight-time Academy Award winning musical My Fair Lady, and the two films differ greatly from one another in several respects; at the same time they also share some striking similarities as off-the-beaten-path romantic comedies both set in London, England. To begin with, because My Fair Lady is set in the Edwardian period—the first decade of the twentieth century—the mannerisms and more importantly the ideals of the era straight away contrast with those found in About a Boy, which is set in modern times.     

To sum up, About a Boy and My Fair Lady were each in their own time unique in plot line and quite different from the typical romantic comedy standard. With an emphasis on personality flaws, isolation, the “weaker” transforming the life of the “younger,” and an inconclusive romantic ending, both films stray from the usual expectations of the sub-genre to give refreshing new plot lines to viewers. And in so doing, newer dimensions to romantic comedy have been added and the frontier of the sub genre has broadened not only for the sake of the art of film itself but intellectuals invested in it.

About a Boy Trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XO4pbtwisBE

My Fair Lady Trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHrgSXPxr9w

The Power of Smiling

Hey Everyone :)

Today was a good day. Well, at first, as usually around that time of the year, I was worried and anxious thinking about all the exams I have yet to study for and other stuff I have to do. On the train, however, while I was going through my notes once again and desperately trying to memorize a few more things, I noticed an old lady smiling at me—and I couldn’t help myself from smiling back. She then began talking to me, telling me not to take things too seriously but to take it one step at a time and everything will work out great in the end.    

That encounter reminded me of a quote I really like. Mother Teresa once said "Every time you smile at someone, it is an action of love, a gift to that person, a beautiful thing". A lot of what Mother Teresa said during her life was concerning smiling, helping the poor and sharing/spreading love. I agree with her on all her quotes concerning smiling, and what this little gesture can do to people. Indeed, a smile can save someone’s day. There are a few small smiles I encountered that not only managed to save my day but managed to get me through life’s burdens (thanks to my family). What I am referring to now is surely something you have all encountered before. There must have been someone that smiled at you and you knew if it weren't for that smile you could've ended up pretty bad in life. I am happy I had people smile at me. There is definitely more to a smile than just opening your mouth wide and showing your lovely (hopefully clean) teeth. It is (like Mother Teresa said) "an action of love, a gift... a beautiful thing". This is why I encourage you to smile wherever you go. SMILE. Life’s just too short to be making long faces and worrying about all kinds of things all the time. Show people you love them; show the stranger that today is a good day. Help the old lady get on the train with a smile on your face, showing her that we are all happy to help her out. Why? (There doesn’t always have to be something good in return just for you to do good, but) I could assure you that once you help her on the train you will see the sweetest smile ever. Yes, she probably doesn’t have any teeth, but she definitely knows how to make your day.